![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was thinking they were likely more than 30k. Are you confident on that
number? Also, 172's and Diamond Stars are coming with the G1000. You can order either of those planes with a single NAV/COM/GPS, standard six pack, VOR Head, Transponder (no traffic), intercom and engine instruments for at least 30k less than the minimal install price of a G1000 unit. You are correct if you compare to a normally well configured 182, Star or Mooney that they are nearly the same though. The question will be what pricing model will the manufacturers use to bring it to upgrade planes and low end models to increase the market. I suspect they may try to sell units with lower capabilities built in that you will have to pay a software charge to use. The real question is Chelton. Will they try to increase their marketshare by discounting heavily, betting on volume (like Cirrus has done). "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... What new planes ship with a single navcom these days? The G1000 as installed in a single like a 182 costs about $30K and includes audio, VOR, GS, GPS, transponder, Airspeed, ADI, HSI, VSI, MFD, Fuel, Tach, MP, intercom, ammeter, as well as a bunch of stuff that the older 182 is unlikely to have. So the $30k system is replacing everything except the standby AH, airspeed and altimeter. Of course most 182s don't have these redundant instruments. Since everything is integrated, the wiring is significantly reduced too saving expensive labor. Mike MU-2 "Dude" wrote in message ... What is interesting, but hasn't come into play yet is that the G-1000 is cheaper (to Cessna) than the instruments it replaces. At some point manufacturers will stop charging a premium for glass. My guess is that it will happen in the next two years. Mike MU-2 Is it really cheaper? If you are talking about a replacement for a full panel with HSI, Dual Nav/Com/GPS, engine analysis system, and intercom with traffic - then you are certainly correct. But is it cheaper than a base unit with a single Nav/Com? Anyone know what the cost of the AHRS really is? That seems to be the main thing. I can see how the rest could end up being cheaper easily. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to License Your Homebuilt Aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 05 04:11 PM |
Questions about the new Sports Pilot license | G EddieA95 | Home Built | 0 | September 5th 04 09:07 PM |
Legality of owning ex-military intercontinental aircraft. | Bill Silvey | Military Aviation | 71 | October 15th 03 09:50 PM |
Radio License Question | Tom Nery | Owning | 4 | September 22nd 03 03:52 PM |
Radio station license re-application? | Mike Noel | Owning | 4 | August 13th 03 09:40 PM |