A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Auto conversions & gear boxes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old February 20th 04, 06:08 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:27:38 GMT, "Dave Covert"
wrote:

I notice that most auto engine conversions use a gear box between the engine
and the prop. Why is that? Is it because an auto engine's peak HP is too
high for a prop to swing? Is it because auto engines weren't designed to be
pulled around by their crankshafts and don't have proper thrust bearings?
Both?

Are there any auto/motorcycle conversions that don't require gear boxes?

Dave


Dave, this is kindof the Auto Conversion 101 question no. 1. The
answer is pretty much all of the above.

Auto crankshafts aren't designed for bending loads, so if you bolt a
prop to one, you are taking a big chance that the prop loads
transferred directly to the hub of the crankshaft you bolted the prop
to, could fail the crankshaft, just behind the prop hub.

Many of the early VW direct drive engines did fail in this manner.
This resulted in a lot of changes to the VW engine when used as an
airplane engine, one of the changes was to redesign the crankshaft.
Not all VW engines get so modified though, even today.

Props have an rpm range in which they are most effective. There are
an incredible number of variables, but diameter, shape, cord, pitch,
thickness all play a part in prop design. A bitty prop turning very
fast just isn't as effective as a large prop turning slower. The
smaller prop, with it's smaller diameter has less thrust because much
of the prop is blowing air against the nose of the airplane. It's a
lot more complicated than that but that's the gist.

Auto engines are tiny when compared to direct drive airplane engines.
Take a 180 hp Lycoming. It's cubic inch displacement is 360. They
turn the prop at around 2600 to 2700. The Ford V-6 in airplane trim,
puts out 180 hp also. It displaces 232 inches and makes it's power at
4800 rpm. No prop will work at that rpm. To harness the power, it
needs to be turned slower. Enter the prop speed reduction unit.

The psru takes care of keeping the bending loads off the crankshaft
and reduces prop speed to a more useable rpm.

Yes there are motorcycles that are being used in airplanes, the BMW
comes to mind.

Corky Scott

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D Ebby Home Built 8 November 26th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 1 November 24th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 2 November 24th 03 05:23 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 0 November 24th 03 03:52 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart D. Hull Home Built 0 November 22nd 03 06:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.