![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:27:38 GMT, "Dave Covert"
wrote: I notice that most auto engine conversions use a gear box between the engine and the prop. Why is that? Is it because an auto engine's peak HP is too high for a prop to swing? Is it because auto engines weren't designed to be pulled around by their crankshafts and don't have proper thrust bearings? Both? Are there any auto/motorcycle conversions that don't require gear boxes? Dave Dave, this is kindof the Auto Conversion 101 question no. 1. The answer is pretty much all of the above. Auto crankshafts aren't designed for bending loads, so if you bolt a prop to one, you are taking a big chance that the prop loads transferred directly to the hub of the crankshaft you bolted the prop to, could fail the crankshaft, just behind the prop hub. Many of the early VW direct drive engines did fail in this manner. This resulted in a lot of changes to the VW engine when used as an airplane engine, one of the changes was to redesign the crankshaft. Not all VW engines get so modified though, even today. Props have an rpm range in which they are most effective. There are an incredible number of variables, but diameter, shape, cord, pitch, thickness all play a part in prop design. A bitty prop turning very fast just isn't as effective as a large prop turning slower. The smaller prop, with it's smaller diameter has less thrust because much of the prop is blowing air against the nose of the airplane. It's a lot more complicated than that but that's the gist. Auto engines are tiny when compared to direct drive airplane engines. Take a 180 hp Lycoming. It's cubic inch displacement is 360. They turn the prop at around 2600 to 2700. The Ford V-6 in airplane trim, puts out 180 hp also. It displaces 232 inches and makes it's power at 4800 rpm. No prop will work at that rpm. To harness the power, it needs to be turned slower. Enter the prop speed reduction unit. The psru takes care of keeping the bending loads off the crankshaft and reduces prop speed to a more useable rpm. Yes there are motorcycles that are being used in airplanes, the BMW comes to mind. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D | Ebby | Home Built | 8 | November 26th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |