![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news:1104532621.47695f51644ac10c93563568d2bcd3af@t eranews... You'd get liability coverage so that if you crashed it INTO something thei insurance company would cover what you hit. You'd probably get "not in motion" hull coverage so if the hangar collapsed you'd be covered. You'd skip the "in motion" hull coverage (which is the bulk of the premium). Then, if you crashed, you'd have to pay to repair it or decide it's not repairable and sell the aircraft for salvage. In any survivable accident the salvage value is likely to be pretty high. Someone was telling me that the hull portion was the least portion of the premium. I'm guessing it is the liability, i.e., I crash, kill everyone on board, their families sue, damage/casualties on the ground, etc. The hull coverage is going to be the largest component of insurance by far. On a $400K hull with a low time multi pilot, hull might be 90% of the total premium. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|