![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:47:13 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Mike Rapoport wrote: The maximium draw of the avionics (speaker on, transmitting on both coms) is 20A, the continous draw (not transmitting) is under 15A. I realize that the max for *continous* use is 22A with 12ga, but how much overload is permissible for short term use (long enough for the avionics CBs to pop. You should design the system such that the maximum load that continues for more than a second or two is no more than 80% of the breaker capacity. This is intended to prevent deterioration of the breaker due to frequent operation at temperatures close to the trip point. Design for wire is a different matter, since the heat will not cause the wire to deteriorate until you get it very hot. The risk with wire is that an overload will cause a fire by melting the insulation. I don't know how far you can go and still avoid this, but it should be well above 20 amps. I know that "delayed action" breakers in home wiring situations allow temporary surges of up to 25% of the rated capacity. George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. Thanks. I was hoping for a rule like: "It is permissible to load Tefzel wire over its (35C) continous rating by XX% for up to XX seconds". It seems that no such "rule" exists. BTW I am not going to rewire my certified airplane but I was under the panel lubricating some bowden cables for the cabin heat and noticed two wires with the same origin and destination points which got me to thinking "Why". I am also going to be building a Moose and so I am interested in all this kind of stuff. I appreciate the information. Mike MU-2 Helio Courier That's for redundancy. One breaks, the other handles it. My current avionics panel was wired professionally some years back. When I upgraded the avionics, I found this beautiful job of double wiring, both sides. I wish I would have repeated it, but I didn't. If you're building a Moose, go for it, but there's no need to do a double feed to the buss, especially when you're getting up there in the 12 gauge range. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Charging Question (Electrical - Not Credit) | Michael Bremer | Owning | 15 | January 20th 05 03:00 AM |