![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Big John" wrote in message The P-38 had high speed dive problems. After a number crashed they went back and retrofitted them with 'dive' brakes (narrow strips on top of wing that could be raised to increase drag). These slowed the bird down enough it could be pulled out Wasn't part of that fix also a mass balancer on the elevator, that was a blob raised up on an arm above the elevator? -- Jim in NC More likely the mass balance was used to raise the flutter speed of the elevator. Get it up above the airplane's speed range. Also, while on the subject of P-38 lore... I thought the dive brakes retro on the P-38 was on the bottom of the wing? Part of the problem was that even though the airplane was traveling at less than transonic speed, there were places that the "air" was getting supersonic and creating shock waves. (I put that in quotes, because it's really the airplane that's moving, not the air. The air just gets out of the way - rapidly. Can't blame it.) Then, as speed builds, the shock waves move aft? The Bell X-1 had some problems with the shock waves moving aft on the elevator. Moved right back to the elevator hinge line and elevator control was rather - uhm - nonexistent? The airplane also had a variable incidence stabilizer for elevator trim. Chuck tried flying the airplane with the trim switch and the "all flying" tail, or stabilator was born. If this is happening on the wing, as the pressure point moves aft the nose tucks down very nicely! As pressure increases due to decreasing altitude, the airplane might slow enough to return to normal subsonic conditions, and regain control. But you'd best be hauling that nose up now! Let's say you recover control at 25,000 feet? You are pointed straight down at 500 mph. You are going a little faster than 8 miles a minute, and you are slightly more than 4 miles up... I think it takes about 1.6 seconds from initiation for the seat to clear the airframe... Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D | Ebby | Home Built | 8 | November 26th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |