A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Auto conversions & gear boxes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old February 24th 04, 09:39 PM
Richard Lamb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgans wrote:

"Big John" wrote in message

The P-38 had high speed dive problems. After a number crashed they
went back and retrofitted them with 'dive' brakes (narrow strips on
top of wing that could be raised to increase drag). These slowed the
bird down enough it could be pulled out

Wasn't part of that fix also a mass balancer on the elevator, that was a
blob raised up on an arm above the elevator?
--

Jim in NC


More likely the mass balance was used to raise the flutter speed of the
elevator. Get it up above the airplane's speed range.

Also, while on the subject of P-38 lore...

I thought the dive brakes retro on the P-38 was on the bottom of the
wing?

Part of the problem was that even though the airplane was traveling at
less than transonic speed, there were places that the "air" was getting
supersonic and creating shock waves.

(I put that in quotes, because it's really the airplane that's moving,
not the air. The air just gets out of the way - rapidly. Can't blame
it.)

Then, as speed builds, the shock waves move aft?

The Bell X-1 had some problems with the shock waves moving aft on the
elevator. Moved right back to the elevator hinge line and elevator
control was rather - uhm - nonexistent?

The airplane also had a variable incidence stabilizer for elevator trim.
Chuck tried flying the airplane with the trim switch and the "all
flying"
tail, or stabilator was born.

If this is happening on the wing, as the pressure point moves aft the
nose tucks down very nicely!

As pressure increases due to decreasing altitude, the airplane might
slow
enough to return to normal subsonic conditions, and regain control.

But you'd best be hauling that nose up now!


Let's say you recover control at 25,000 feet?
You are pointed straight down at 500 mph.

You are going a little faster than 8 miles a minute,

and you are slightly more than 4 miles up...

I think it takes about 1.6 seconds from initiation
for the seat to clear the airframe...


Richard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D Ebby Home Built 8 November 26th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 1 November 24th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 2 November 24th 03 05:23 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 0 November 24th 03 03:52 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart D. Hull Home Built 0 November 22nd 03 06:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.