![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at a '73 Cherokee 180 that had an overshoot incident about 300
hours ago. At that time the owner had to do a bottom overhaul I think because of engine stoppage and at the same time did a top overhaul - but not a major. So basically it's been 1600 smoh, but only 300 since bottom and top. He said it saved him about $6,000 at the time to do it this way, but he also said that according to the FAA, this is definetly not considered a major overhaul. The plane is in great shape, repair after the incident professionally done, is nicely equiped and the price reflects the 1600 smoh time and the damage history. It's not a screaming deal but I guess it's a fair deal. If I buy it and fly it for say 2-4 years, then on paper it's approaching tbo, but in reality the engine is probably good for awhile. Would this be a fair statement? What's holding me back is that I'm thinking it's one of those situations where it is going to lose alot of value in the next couple of years,ie it's not going to appreciate like most of the fleet. Should I pass? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |