A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Auto conversions & gear boxes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old February 25th 04, 03:37 PM
Bob Chilcoat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

According to Warren Bode in his definitive book on the P-38, the bob weights
in the center of the elevator were mandated by the Army after one of the
YP-38's shed its tail in a dive. Further dive tests seemed to indicate that
the problem was tail flutter at certain speeds. The bob weights were added
but did not solve the problem. Wind tunnel tests eventually traced the
"flutter" problem to buffeting from turbulence off the joint between the
wing and the center fuselage pod. After a fillet was added to soften this
joint, the "flutter" problem disappeared, but the Army would not let Johnson
remove the bob weights. He hated them (the elevator was already
counterbalanced by concealed weights in the tail cones) and felt that their
only contribution was to kill a few pilots who hit them in bailouts. The
"compressability tuck" problem was investigated at the same time, but was
only solved by means of the dive brakes that were added to the P-38J-25-LO
and subsequent models. As it turned out, the compressability problem could
not occur in any P-38's if dives were initiated below 25,000 feet. Since
most P-38 operations during the war were below that altitude, few pilots
encountered the problem in combat.
--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Big John" wrote in message

The P-38 had high speed dive problems. After a number crashed they
went back and retrofitted them with 'dive' brakes (narrow strips on
top of wing that could be raised to increase drag). These slowed the
bird down enough it could be pulled out

Wasn't part of that fix also a mass balancer on the elevator, that was a
blob raised up on an arm above the elevator?
--

Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 2/20/2004




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D Ebby Home Built 8 November 26th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 1 November 24th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 2 November 24th 03 05:23 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 0 November 24th 03 03:52 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart D. Hull Home Built 0 November 22nd 03 06:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.