![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to Warren Bode in his definitive book on the P-38, the bob weights
in the center of the elevator were mandated by the Army after one of the YP-38's shed its tail in a dive. Further dive tests seemed to indicate that the problem was tail flutter at certain speeds. The bob weights were added but did not solve the problem. Wind tunnel tests eventually traced the "flutter" problem to buffeting from turbulence off the joint between the wing and the center fuselage pod. After a fillet was added to soften this joint, the "flutter" problem disappeared, but the Army would not let Johnson remove the bob weights. He hated them (the elevator was already counterbalanced by concealed weights in the tail cones) and felt that their only contribution was to kill a few pilots who hit them in bailouts. The "compressability tuck" problem was investigated at the same time, but was only solved by means of the dive brakes that were added to the P-38J-25-LO and subsequent models. As it turned out, the compressability problem could not occur in any P-38's if dives were initiated below 25,000 feet. Since most P-38 operations during the war were below that altitude, few pilots encountered the problem in combat. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Big John" wrote in message The P-38 had high speed dive problems. After a number crashed they went back and retrofitted them with 'dive' brakes (narrow strips on top of wing that could be raised to increase drag). These slowed the bird down enough it could be pulled out Wasn't part of that fix also a mass balancer on the elevator, that was a blob raised up on an arm above the elevator? -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 2/20/2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D | Ebby | Home Built | 8 | November 26th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |