![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Bart wrote I mean if there's 300,000 ish AOPA members out there, then that's an important block of votes. No it's not. It's a tiny, insignificant block of votes. That's got to be one of the biggest PAC's next to AARP. It's not even on the same order of magnitude as AARP. I believe AARP is at least 100 times bigger than AOPA. True, but AOPA sits astride a unique demographic: I'd guess that pilots gnerally vote overwhelmingly Republican. To the extent that they might be willing to withold their votes from this president (or - gasp! - even vote for someone else), they could potentially move a lot more votes than a group whose voting record is much more evenly divided across the political spectrum. I agree that in raw numbers, the "pilot vote" doesn't look like it's very big. But since the vast majority of pilots probably voted for Dubya last time, AOPA could potentially have an impact that's much greater than the raw numbers suggest. For example: You **** off the National Education Association (mostly Democratic voters) and this president doesn't stand to lose much - not too many NEA members voted for Bush last time. But **** off 400,000 AOPA members - who (I suspect) DID vote for Bush in droves last time - and there might be a real price to pay in the next election. At least that's what I like to think. Those who were paying attention will recall that the last presidential election was - ahem - CLOSE. I think the next one will be too. Every vote counts (well...except in Florida, of course ![]() David H Boeing Field (BFI), Seattle, WA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|