![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve House wrote:
Assuming the problems reported are legit In other words, maybe I'm an idiot or making this up? Good start.... , this seems to indicate a quality assurance issue with the manufacturer. No argument there. I was just looking over the Lightspeed web site and didn't see any indication that their headsets were TSO'd. True. Neither are any of the other ANR headsets AFAIK Now I will be the first to admit I'm a newby so I my impressions may be in error and as such take anything I say with a grain of salt but my understanding of what TSO means is that 1: the product was type accepted, passed testing to insure that it did what it was supposed to and was compatible with and did not interact negatively with the other aircraft systems, and 2: that the manufacturer has quality assurance programs in effect that would insure all products coming off the line met the same performance standards as the samples submitted for approval. Negative. What TSO'd means is that the product met the "type standards order" the FAA has produced for that type of product. The TSO for a given product may literally be decades old, and a product which meets it may (of necessity) be inferior to a product which does not. The TSO says nothing about testing/compatibility with other aircraft systems. The TSO says nothing about quality assurance. It simply says that the product, as designed and evaluated, met the standards of the order. QA is what a "PMA" is supposed to be about. I may be wrong, but it seems to me to be foolish to buy non-TSO'ed equipment for permanent aircraft installation or for use by the PIC or FO if there is one. We-eeeel, when you're making your purchasing and maintenance decisions, you're entitled to chose according to your convictions. Just remember this: Bernoulli not Marconi makes the plane fly. And here's another little tidbit for you: I've been in the clag with a TSO'd transponder which was emitting smoke and the charming odure of frying electronics. So I wouldn't bet the rent on the TSO quality thing. is something I personally can't afford at any price and battery packs that spontaneously burst into flame certainly seem to me to be a safety issue, Who on earth talked about "battery packs that spontaneously burst into flame?" Jay (who has not experienced this problem) wondered if this could happen, and I explained: no. The thing did get durned hot, and could conceivably have melted low-temperature plastic on which it was placed. It was not hot enough to ignite either paper or plastic and was unlikely to become so, because the plastic deformed and ended the short circuit long before that point. HTH, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Batteries, charger for Yaesu handheld - NiCad or NiMH? | David Herman | Owning | 10 | November 7th 04 04:30 PM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |
Lightspeed Comes Through! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 75 | August 25th 03 04:45 PM |
Lightspeed Battery Box Warning | David Rind | Owning | 76 | July 13th 03 03:12 AM |
Lightspeed Battery Box Warning | David Rind | Piloting | 1 | July 8th 03 02:37 PM |