![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Doug" wrote
You didn't mention the reasons for their tardiness. I understand your frustration, but am not quite ready to place all the blame squarely on the airline. That's irrelevant. When you sell something to a customer, and then the customer doesn't get what he was promised, then it's your fault. Even if you put somewhere in the fine print that he might not get what he was promised, it's still your fault. That arrival time you print on the ticket? That's a promise. If you have certain suppliers/vendors/regulators who are known not to be reliable, then it's your responsibility to either replace them or factor in the unreliability into your schedules. My flight yesterday (NOT for Scareways) started 4 hours late. Our plane was delayed inbound for 3 hours because of flow control problems in Chicago. The airline can't do anything about it. Really? Were you shocked that there were flow control problems in Chicago? How about mildly surprised? No? Is it maybe because the airline has scheduled way too many flights to arrive and depart at the same time from the same little patch of concrete, knowing there's not a chance in hell that will work except under ideal conditions? See, the airline CAN do something about it. It can schedule realistically. If you know the airport can't possibly handle 200 operations in an hour except under ideal conditions, then don't schedule 200 operations. Really, it's that simple. In the meantime, a police officer showed up at the cabin entrance and asked for a female passenger to be removed. It turns out that the woman had assaulted her intransigent teenage daughter while in the terminal. While I'm certainly not making excuses for assault (there is no excuse for assault) the fact remains that people are only human, and when their plans are screwed up due to circumstances beyond their control they get angry and frustrated, and some are prone to violence. And if the scheduling had allowed for reasonable airport capacity, rather than what you can get under ideal conditions, there probably would have been no assault and consequent investigation. I have little doubt that a few of our frustrated passengers may swear off traveling with us again. On the other hand, I know that trips with such frustration are the exception. No they're not. In my experience, they're the rule. And I can assure you that at this point, MOST of your frustrated passengers are only flying because they have no choice (meaning as a condition of employment) and many would be happy to see you all go out of business so they could take alternate transportation. I also know that traveling by personal aircraft has it's own frustrations. Yeah. Like just a few months ago I had a mechanical problem - right engine starter bendix wouldn't engage. Takeoff was delayed by two hours while I decowled the engine, cleaned out the bendix, and reassembled. Funny, though - I didn't miss any of my connections, didn't have to sit for hours in a tiny cramped seat, didn't have to eat crappy food, and didn't tell my passengers how it wasn't my fault. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
angle points in victor airways | John Hamilton | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | October 15th 04 04:55 AM |
FA: British Caledonian Airways Boeing 707 Model aircraft | Baron Corvo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 31st 04 12:37 AM |
Victor Airways on Approach Control Radar? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | February 26th 04 02:23 PM |
Victor Airways in Clearance | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 50 | February 15th 04 06:42 PM |
Low and high altitude airways | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | September 9th 03 01:18 AM |