A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aren't You Happy You Voted For Baby Bush? (ATC Privatization)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old August 1st 03, 05:31 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 03:54:04 GMT, Newps wrote in
Message-Id: wp0Wa.15560$Oz4.5543@rwcrnsc54:

The user fees for an airplane that is 5000 pounds or less is a flat
$60 Canadian per year. In the grand scheme of things that is nothing,
I pay more than that to the state of Montana each year for my "tabs".


Have you any idea what you pay into the Aviation Trust Fund via
aviation fuel taxes annually?

Having said all that I still wouldn't want their whole system,
just parts of it.


My fear is that a privatized US ATC would be like putting the fox in
charge of the henhouse, because it will likely be run by airline
industry airplane manufacturer(s). I would have a hard time believing
Boeing or LockMart, or ... could reframe from influencing the redesign
the NAS to suit their customers' requests at the expense of the equity
with which GA is afforded in today's NAS.

Here's some supporting information about that notion:


----------------------------------------------------------
AOPA ePilot Volume 5, Issue 31 August 1, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------

AOPA PROTECTS PILOT INTERESTS IN FAA NAVIGATION PLAN
The FAA has put out its roadmap for the future of aerial
navigation, and the bottom line for general aviation pilots is
that today's avionics equipment will continue to serve GA pilots
well into the future, thanks to AOPA advocacy. The Roadmap for
Performance-Based Navigation is an air carrier-driven plan to
tighten navigation tolerances and increase airspace capacity. It
creates a system in which an aircraft must meet specific avionics
capabilities (Required Navigation Performance or RNP) to use
airways and arrival and departure procedures in busy terminal
airspace (Class B). AOPA battled to make sure that VFR aircraft
would be exempted from RNP requirements, that IFR aircraft could
participate using today's IFR-certified GPS receivers, and that
RNP would provide benefits for GA pilots. See (
http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...03-3-046x.html ).

--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.