![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:bUp0b.200383$Ho3.26912@sccrnsc03... This has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that skin color or religious preference is patently and demonstrably harmless, while sexual attraction is potentially and demonstrably harmful -- especially in groups of pre-teen boys (and girls). Skin color is patently harmless? Really? Ever heard of the Black Panthers? Religious preference is harmless? Really? Funny...seems like a couple of years ago, some VERY religious-minded folks destroyed the World Trade Center. Differences in skin color or religious preference have a GREAT potential for causing conflict and harm. That potential need not be nearly as militant as the examples I've given to do serious harm, either psychologically or physically. As far as sexual attraction being potentially and demonstrably harmful, I suppose that depends on what you mean. If teenages are not properly supervised, there is the potential for fraternization. However, I will tell you this: there was a LOT more fraternization and a LOT less supervision when I was a teenager at co-ed church retreats then when I was a teenager at Boy Scout camping trips (and remember, I was in the Boy Scouts before it occurred to anyone to ask someone if they were gay before letting them be in the troop, either as a scout or a leader). However, I fail to see what is inherently harmful about the fraternization. Even the military is on pretty thin ice with their claim that romantic involvements between servicemen can undermine the safety of the entire group, and at least in their case they do have people shooting at them on a regular basis. I can't imagine what harm could come from a couple of gay boys in the same Boy Scout troop having a romantic involvement (other than the usual problems of immature teenagers being involved sexually, regardless of sexual preference). At least you know they're not going to get pregnant. I wouldn't want my Girl Scout daughter chaperoned overnight by a male troop leader, either, for fear of what might happen. There were lots of women at the summer camp I went to when I was a Boy Scout. For some reason, no funny business ever happened, nor was anyone worried about mixed-gender leadership. Beyond that, as has been pointed out multiple times already, you are more likely to find a heterosexual male willing to prey on a teenage boy than you are to find a homosexual male willing to do the same. Your concern should be based on reality, not your existing prejudice and lack of understanding of what it actually means to be homosexual. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Question About Newsgroups | RST Engineering | General Aviation | 1 | January 17th 05 05:59 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |
Newsgroups and Email | Jim Weir | Home Built | 8 | July 8th 03 11:30 PM |
Newsgroups and Email | Jim Weir | Owning | 8 | July 8th 03 11:30 PM |