![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete Zaitcev" wrote in message
news ![]() This depends on how big the data piece is relative to the starting handshake. Consider that TCP start-up involves so-called 3-way handshake, and that many protocols have a setup phase when client and server exchange messages strictly in simplex, before bulk data transmission can commence. Regardless, that still only affects the initial delay in response. Even if the delay were 10 seconds (which it's almost never going to be), that's in the same ballpark as the delay some servers have just getting around to servicing a client. It's just not a big deal. [...] So, your downlink is virtually rain proof. The bad news is that the same cannot be said about your uplink. Hmmm...okay, I see. I wasn't aware that they didn't provide a high enough power transmitter to deal with weather. Solstices only knock communication off for several minutes a day, when the Sun is directly behind the satellite. It is a well known effect. I used to depend on an old Soviet satellite Raduga-7 for connectivity, and it was true back then. Several minutes? I guess I'd call that insignificant. That's what, 10 minutes of downtime per year? Big deal. I have to deal with that kind of downtime with my wired DSL access. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBO's and WiFi | Javier Henderson | General Aviation | 43 | August 30th 03 08:22 AM |