![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wish Linksys made a router that would connect to the satellite
system's USB cable and run those Windows-only drivers and datacomm software. But unfortunately they don't. Looks like the satellite outfit had deliberately designed their system to exclude non-Windows customers. They must own MS stock or something. [I'm getting way off topic here, but feel the need to voice my opinion anyway] As to tolerating even a limited presence of Windows on the network, these guys are the type that will say they'll be happy to do that the day that everyone else is willing to tolerate privatization and user fees in the US national ATC system. It's a matter of sticking to one's principles, and with the onslaught of yet another Windows virus/worm/trojan after another, after another, after another, after another... ad nauseum, I don't blame them one bit. Seems that just merely placing a Windows box on the public Internet anymore is fast becoming an act of careless negligence, and even could be considerd aiding cyberterrorism. I'm presently still a Windows user myself, but this latest triple-shot of malware hammering the Internet, all facilitated due to Windows, is the icing on the cake. I guarantee the next computer I purchase will NOT be a Windows machine. Those new Apple PowerBooks, albeit pricey, sure are looking more and more appealing. "John Harper" wrote in message news:1061403096.349486@sj-nntpcache-3... Huh? MS attempted to build a NT-based router several years ago and gave up. There is no such animal. OTOH a Linksys router will cost $100-200 at your friendly local Fry's (or whatever) and will do everything required. I suppose I should admit a bias here since Linksys just got acquired by my employer, but actually we acquired them precisely BECAUSE they are such a good fit to this kind of requirement. They have competitors like Netgear who do the same kind of thing at the same price point, so you can take this as a generic recommendation. John "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "One's Too Many" wrote in message m... [...] The money for acquiring a broadband Internet connection for our humble little FBO is being mostly pooled together by the local EAA / homebuilt guys who are all quite the Linux and Apple zealots and hate Microsoft. A Windows-only broadband connection will be totally unpalateable to them. Well, it's true. Religious zealots often pay dearly for their irrational beliefs. By the way, if they'd tolerate even a single Windows box (the cost of which would be miniscule compared to the total cost of the Internet connection), they could hook up whatever other operating systems they want, using the Windows box as the network router. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBO's and WiFi | Javier Henderson | General Aviation | 43 | August 30th 03 08:22 AM |