![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billy Beck wrote in message . ..
"The Raven" wrote: Try living in a motel at the end of a SAC runway (for 3 months). Triple buff takeoffs at 5am, full noise, about 200ft over your head. By November of 1972, Barksdale was *too quiet* for me to sleep. That was very wierd. Billy http://www.two--four.net/weblog.php Read recently (in an article I cannot now find) about an airplane designed and built in the '60s or '70s that had a turbojet engine in the tail and a huge turboprop in the nose. Supposed to be a fighter or fighter-bomber. Only two were built, and after one flight the test pilots didn't want to fly them any more. They were LOUD in the cockpit or anywhere else. It hurt bad. Very few test flights were carried out. I imagine they were designed to defeat the enemy through intimidation alone. Apparently most of the noise came from the prop tips, which were running supersonic or transonic, even in static runups. One of the pilots lived ten miles from the airbase, and he could hear the techs running it up, on the ground, all the way from his home. That has to be pretty bad. Anyone here remember what it was? Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thinking out loud | Marco Rispoli | Owning | 21 | May 4th 04 04:22 PM |
LOUD | Scott Lowrey | Military Aviation | 40 | September 11th 03 12:39 AM |
'They want to ban recreational flying...' | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 28 | July 22nd 03 07:20 PM |