![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:38:28 GMT, "Roger Long"
om wrote: Climbing at the speeds given in the Cessna POH for our 172 N are not a particularly good idea. The nose is so high that the view of any traffic ahead is pretty well obscured. 80 knots provides visibility sufficient to see even some aircraft that may be climbing to your altitude. The engine stays cooler and ground landmarks are easier to track. Whenever I've been planning a long trip and wanted to identify top of climb for starting the cruise legs, I've wondered what the numbers were for 80 knots in our plane and at the lower gross weight I usually make my longer trips at. I finally decided to find out. The results can be seen he http://baldeagleflyingclub.org/Climb80.pdf Roger, does the N model have 160 hp or 180? With or without wheelpants? Thanks, Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 02:14 AM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Second Stage Climb Gradient? | Bill | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 15th 03 06:41 PM |
Second Stage Climb Gradient? | Bill | Piloting | 10 | September 15th 03 06:41 PM |