![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
... Using DUATS or other planners doesn't necessarily mean letting the software select your waypoints. You can choose those yourself, and just let the planner perform the tedious calculation of each leg's distance, course, ground speed, wind correction angle, elapsed time, and fuel consumption. But I don't find it tedious to plot each leg's course and distance. It is part of being a pilot; how can it be tedious? Repetitive arithmetic calculations are tedious (and error-prone) regardless of the context. Besides, another part of being a pilot is making use of the best available tools. And where do you draw the line? If you balk at using a flight planner to calculate each leg's course, distance, ground speed, wind correction, elapsed time, and fuel used, then why not reject the E6B as well, and insist on doing all the calculations with just pencil and paper? My airplane's fuel consumption is something I already know. Yes, but the fuel used for each leg (as well as the cumulative usage and remaining fuel at each waypoint) has to be calculated afresh. Obvously, I can't calculate GS, WCA and ET because I won't know the wind until the day of the trip--and even then, wind forecasts are notoriously inaccurate. Using a flight planner, I can quickly generate a no-wind plan for each of several prospective routes, comparing the distances and times involved. I can contrast a direct route with a more scenic route, or look at various IFR routes that ATC might assign me. Shortly before the flight, I can get wind-adjusted plans for several scenarios, including different altitudes as well as different routes. A strong wind has a significant impact on flight times; even inaccurate forecasts are usually a better bet than a no-wind plan on a windy day. I see the value in occasionally calculating diversion legs by hand while flying, just to stay in practice for real-time planning. But I don't need to perform that exercise for each leg of each contemplated route of each flight, any more than I need to re-read all the FARs before each flight. --Gary vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Want simple flight planning software | marc | Home Built | 13 | December 20th 04 04:36 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |