|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#20
October 17th 03, 04:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Fry wrote:
- I rarely print photos, viewing them on the computer instead. So more pixels simply means you get to crop more of the original picture. I'm still happy with 2.1 MP. More pixels means more detail captured so that *when you crop* you still retain a good quality picture. I used to have a 2.1mp but I found that cropping more than half the picture would result in a remaining picture that was too grainy. Having more megapixels means having more cropping options for those times the subject was too far away. -- Peter 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
| Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
| Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
| Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
| Ta-152H at low altitudes | N-6 | Military Aviation | 16 | October 13th 03 03:52 AM |
Threaded Mode