![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:56:10 -0700, "Tom S."
wrote: "Ron Natalie" wrote in message om... "Tom S." wrote in message ... Since LBJ's wife was a major shareholder in the transportation company (marine shipping) that had virtually a monopoly contract to ship war material to Vietnam...well, you can guess the rest. Lady Bird was owner of the Johnson businesses in name only. Probably. I wonder what the rules were in the early 60's regarding blind trusts, etc., for government officials. For the record, to clarify my initial reply, I would not defend LBJ politically, or Lady Bird. (I am not a democrat.) I was only trying to point out the inherent weakness in the Asian commitment. As a congressman who had a reputation as being pushy to get his way, Viet Nam seems to be more of somebody else's war, (McNamara's, and the military's), not his. A blind trust was a notable factor in burying us into Viet Nam? Mentioned in this newsgroup? That's a joke, right? But it might actually clarify reasons for being indescisive. How much blood money does one really need? It may be a bit silly to give full credit to Jacqueline. But I've had enough of JFK, a long time ago. I don't see it all, and I'm not surprised that I don't. _I've seen no personality from him._ We cried for JFK because we were told to, because we were of the type back then who could still cry. Those are the sorrows, both of them. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|