![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:26:00 +0100, Martin Hotze
wrote: ISTR that Germany has still got foreign troops on its soil. well, this is Germans business. Their treaties might forbid to dismiss foreign troops. But maybe it is a good deal for the Germans (economical speaking). All those thousands of soldiers need to spend their money somewhere. It's better than that. It means that Germany need not field a large defense force, (I know it has one, but it's not the size of the old Wehrmacht, I'm sure) and thus spares itself the cost of that force. Guns 'n' Butter: they're making butter first, and left most of the guns in the hands of NATO and the U.S. Rob -- [You] don't make your kids P.C.-proof by keeping them ignorant, you do it by helping them learn how to educate themselves. -- Orson Scott Card |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|