![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:05:02 -0800, "David Brooks"
wrote: I was going to point out that having the states' economies so interdependent is a powerful disincentive, in terms of pure self-interest, to make war, so we needn't worry about independent armies so much. Then I remembered what happened in the US in 1861. I think the States were all on an agreed upon gold standard at the time; there was no other economic union beyond the constitutional prohibition on interstate tariffs. The reason we all could do that to one another back then was that Virginians and New Yorkers thought of themselves as Virginians and New Yorkers first, and Americans second. Robert E. Lee's decision, for one example. The situation is still somewhat similar in Europe today. The Euros think of themselves as French, Danish, German, Austrian, English, Scottish, etc, first, and only then as Europeans. NATO mitigates that a bit, but I think that's only with the 800-lb gorilla (U.S.) in the alliance, and if that dissolves, then factionalism in Europe, in the form of nationalism, could become more than the barely suppressed problem it is today. Rob -- [You] don't make your kids P.C.-proof by keeping them ignorant, you do it by helping them learn how to educate themselves. -- Orson Scott Card |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|