A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

cleared, then busted



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 24th 03, 09:09 PM
Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Happy Dog wrote:


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, Bob Noel
said:
In article , (Paul
Tomblin) wrote:
They can't do a worse job than the beancounters are doing now. Says

the
guy who had two doctor ordered treatments turned down by ****ing

insurance
companies.

I don't want to bet your health or life on it. Says the guy working
in the acquisition of systems for the government.


I bet the first 35 years of my life on the Canadian system, and it worked
pretty damn well.


You ever need dialysis? Ever wonder what you would do if medical
attention was available (for the person of your choice) and that you could
afford, but
not allowed? Examples of this situation abound. Try to get a
non-emergency
MRI in Toronto within a year. Try to get dialysis (even just for fun).
What did you bet on? What was your ante?

le moo


While perhaps interesting for comparison purposes, the availability of
dialysis "just for fun", or any other elective medical procedure isn't
really relavent. I don't care how long one has to wait for that nose job.
What's important is what happens when one is sick/broken and not wealthy.

I've never been treated in Canada but from what I gather the Canadians have
a good system that accomodates most everyone in a humane way. Contrast that
to the US system where if you are middle class or below and get sick you
risk extra trouble from the stress of (real or potential) denial which
could lead to financial ruin. If you're unemployed you may be denied
followup treatment altogether.

I am fully aware that "free" health care promotes abuse. People should have
a stake in their own treatment's cost when they are able to pay. But the
notion that just about everyone in the US is one major illness away from
financial ruin is what's wrong here.

Getting sick is bad enough, but adding to the suffering so drug companies
and HMO's can make big profits is wrong. Add the fact that these same
entities more or less wrote the laws by buying off the Congress and it
becomes downright immoral.

Again, don't get me wrong - I don't begrudge any legitimate business a
profit, but the drug companies are out of control. Their profits are
obscene and way beyond what they need to recover research costs. Their
manipulation of the various patent laws topped off with their misleading
advertising costs all of us.
--
Frank....H
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cleared for an approach, then given a different altitude assignment Peter R. Instrument Flight Rules 42 December 11th 04 04:44 PM
Busted IFR Checkride Jon Kraus Instrument Flight Rules 77 May 4th 04 02:31 PM
"cleared to ... when direct ..." John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 21 February 11th 04 04:00 PM
Cleared for Hire for sale Kobra Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 25th 03 03:11 PM
rec.aviation.questions is busted Dan Jacobson General Aviation 2 November 18th 03 05:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.