|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
March 27th 04, 11:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:26:00 -0500, Bryan Martin wrote:
in article , Darrel Toepfer at wrote on 3/27/04 1:49 PM: BllFs6 wrote: Am I right in the main disadvantage of a powered glider is long take off rolls and lack of fancy aerobatics? Other considerations I am missing? 4 to 6 seat capacity comes to my mind (needs/wants)... How about 13? http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/air_power/ap26.htm Sure doesn't look like a powered glider to me. If you are looking for a large capacity powered glider, the ME-323 is the closest I can think of - accommodation for 120 passengers. But it would never have shut down the engines and glided, so it doesn't really fit the current understanding of those terms. http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/me323.html http://www.flight-history.com/plane_stats/acModelView.php?makeId=40&makeName=Messerschmitt&m odelId=402 -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ e-mail: khorton02(_at_)rogers(_dot_)com 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
Threaded Mode