![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ink.net, Tom
Fleischman writes: In article , Wdtabor wrote: To use pre-emption, you must be capable of a decisive blow. Should N. Korea launch its 3 nukes at us tomorrow, (assuming they have them and the delivery capability), they would sting us, but we would then dump such nuclear fire on them that Godzilla's would be popping up as far away as the Aleutians. On the other hand, we could, if that little gargoyle succeeding in really frightening us, pre-emptively take them out. Jesus, you sound like your mouth is watering at the thought of using nuclear weapons. You can't seriously be advocating nuclear holocaust, can you? Man, you are a nightmare. You remind me of the character Gen. Buck Turgitsen in "Dr. Strangelove": "I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed, but it would be no more than 20-30 million killed, tops". You are scary, dude! You really creep me out. Good. That is the whole point of deterence. If we are to live at peace, we must make sure the monsters of the world clearly understand we have the ability AND the resolve to utterly destroy them if they threaten us. We cannot create a world where we sit and sing kumbaya and the monsters turn into good guys. There will always be monsters wherever the good guys do nothing. So the best we can do is to kill a few monsters now and then to bring clarity to the minds of the others. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|