A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Big Kahunas



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old December 14th 03, 05:45 PM
Carl Ellis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



It was derived from the numbers of illegals that apply for services

divided
by high/low estimates from INS. I don't remember the exact source, but it
came out in May, 2001.

AAMOF, my M-I-L, who is 88, has voted in every election since 1936, after
coming over from Scotland when she was nine yers old, and has NEVER become

a
US citizen (as she's now finding out the hard way as she applies for
assisted living for seniors).


Until you have a reference and data it's supposition and unproven. It's a
pretty far stretch from applying for services to voting.



Well, then let's talk about the flawed voter roll purges that occured in
both Texas and Florida.
http://dir.salon.com/politics/featur...ile/index.html


Really credible source, Salon is.


Ok here are more references.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/3594763.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
http://www.examiner.com/opinion/defa...editorial0522w



The argument is AMERICANS...and that implies ONCE, LIVING, NOT A FELON...


A felony conviction does not permenantly remove your right to vote. If it
were I'm sure
Admiral Poindexter would be very disappointed. If you read the article you
would see that it's not just an issue with felons, it's also just the plain
sloppy job the company did, capturing people who had no conviction. Their
selection algorithm was just plain flawed.

I remember that in the first hours of the election returns Bush had a

54-46%
lead over Gore (at about the 35-45% of votes cast). Considering that rural
areas, Bush's strong points, are LATER in getting their numbers in,
something funky happened.


Again, just conjecture.


They never did look into the counties that had HUGH turnouts by dead

people,

Data please.

including several counties that Gore won that were very typical Bush
territory


Not inconceivable.

even more votes cast than people living there (New York and
Penn.).


Live in one county, work and vote in another. References?





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.