![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 235 was never going to sell as well as the 182 or
206 anyway which both have significant utility advantages operating off-airport and short field. Well, that's somewhat debatable. If you're talking about landing in wagon-rutted fields with three-foot hedges on either side, you're right -- the 182's high wing and steel gear will beat the low wing aircraft, hand's down. However, it's kind of the aviation version of SUV marketing: Sure, a Hummer can climb a 60 degree slope, but who really cares? 99.995% of the population will drive it to the store. Bottom line: I fly the Pathfinder in and out of grass strips that would challenge a lesser plane. That's as "off-road" as I care to get. Heck, that's MORE "off-road" than most pilots I know *ever* get. (D'ja ever take your MU-2 into Amana? :-) Sure they could have sold more *if* the price was unchanged, but what if it cost $10,000 more? As I understand it, the 235 was already priced higher than the 182 back in '74 -- so the chances of Piper coming in with it under-priced were unlikely. Still, Piper sold enough 235s and 236s to make them a profitable line, and the second door would only have helped sales. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|