![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hunting ammo for rifles is also brass-jacketed. The difference between it and military rounds is that the jacket on military rounds covers the entire bullet; in hunting rounds, the tip is left exposed. This gives the military round more range and decreases the chance that the round will kill the enemy soldier (as agreed to by the Hague Convention). The hunting round expands more readily on contact and is designed to kill as humanely (ie: rapidly) as possible. Well, this is just a little bit off, in my experience. Jacketed rounds aren't meant to less the chance the round will kill the soldier, but to lessen the damage it does to his insides if he survives the hit. And hunting rounds are soft-nosed not to kill rapidly but to ensure that a leg wound or or non-fatal hit will cripple the deer, so that he will be tracked and killed by the hunter, rather than escaping into the next county and dying a slow death from the cold and predators. I know how hunting rounds are built. I'm sitting less than two feet from a box of .303 British Core Lokt Soft Point. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pope C-130s Supply Beans and Bullets to Terror War, By Donna Miles | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 26th 04 11:21 PM |
Instructors: is no combat better? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 103 | March 13th 04 09:07 PM |