![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
news:b_EJb.49247$I07.150198@attbi_s53... I have flown a Seminole over the Cascades with three adult passengers, and it was a dog. Tops were at 12000 and I was in and out, unable to climb much higher. I am not proud of my decision to go that day. Still, I fail to see what relevance to the accident in question that has. All airplanes have a service ceiling, and the "trick" is to plan the flight so as to not need to climb above that. Even IFR over the Cascades, there's no need to go higher than 12000' absent bad weather conditions (icing, convection, high winds, etc.). MEAs are significantly lower than that. If there was something wrong with your decision to fly that day, it would have had something to do with the weather, or the weights of your passenger (if you flew overgross), or something along those lines. I don't see anything inherently wrong with flying an airplane at or near maximum gross weight, and certainly having all the seats full does not necessarily mean the airplane was over the max gross weight, nor would it necessarily have contributed anything to the accident in question. If by "the Seminole is not a real four passenger airplane any more than a Cessna 172 is", what you meant was "the Seminole can carry four passengers just fine, depending on their weight", then I misunderstood, and you can ignore all that I wrote. Insofar as the HTML question is concerned, I'm not computer savvy enough to know what I am doing wrong. Why has this question just popped up, after the many, many times I have posted without changing any settings?? Not sure. I haven't been paying close attention, but perhaps your newsreader is set to post in HTML, but does so only when you are posting a message that is *not* a reply, using instead the previous post's formatting (which is almost always plain text) when you are replying. In other words, when you start a thread, it winds up HTML. When you reply to a plain text message, it winds up plain text. Could that be the difference? Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Airplane Crash | Harry O | Home Built | 1 | November 15th 04 03:40 AM |
Bizzare findings of Flight 93 crash in PA on 9-11 | Laura Bush murdered her boy friend | Military Aviation | 38 | April 12th 04 08:10 PM |
AF investigators cite pilot error in fighter crash | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 09:55 PM |
Sunday's Crash in LI Sound | Marco Leon | Piloting | 0 | November 5th 03 04:34 PM |
Homemade plane crash | Big John | Home Built | 9 | October 17th 03 06:45 PM |