![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... If you are right, then the 45 entry is in violation of 91.126. However, I have my doubts that the application of "logic" is particularly useful in interpreting the FAR's.:-) It's probably better to look at the Chief Counsel's interpretations and the NTSB hearing records To my knowledge, no pilot has ever been violated for a 45 entry, and many cases have upheld the AIM's recommendations as good operating practices, so 45 entries are pretty safe to use, and the disparity between the AIM and 91.126 is little more than a curiosity that the FAA likes to ignore. Agreed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |