![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Recently, Tom Sixkiller posted: "Neil Gould" wrote in message What's the security risk, here? What do you think would happen if someone flew a Cherokee into a plant? Here are some things to consider: * The easiest "target" would be one of the cooling towers. A Cherokee would simply compact itself on the side of the towers and fall off. * The reactor in the plants around here is surrounded by other buildings. It would be *very* difficult to hit the building that contains the reactor. But, the result of doing so with a Cherokee would be similar to the result of the 172 that hit the office building in Fla. You might break a window or two in the building. The fear of danger caused by someone flying a GA plane into a nuclear power plant is simply irrational. There is a *far* greater risk of catastrophe from poor maintenance practices in the every day use of these plants, as can be exemplified by the Davis-Besse fiasco that we're dealing with here in Ohio. Poor maintenance in a government run/regulated facility? The nuclear plants in Ohio are run by private companies, just as other utilities. I suspect that many, if not most plants are owned and operated by private utilities. As for poor regulation... well, that's one of the by-products of relaxed rules and deregulation. In this particular case, the Davis-Besse plant has been down for the last couple of years because of maintenance and operation problems. The problem that got the most attention was a hole about the size of a football eaten almost all the way through the reactor lid by dripping acid. Had that gone far enough that the operating pressure caused the lid to fracture, a good portion of Northern Ohio would have been in deep trouble. The point, though, is that we are supposedly under tightened security, so "why wasn't the action deal with more severely"? The fact is, we're under the *illusion* of tightened security, based on being pointlessly harrassed in fairly meaningless ways. And, in areas where we have some *real* problems, we're far too laxadaisical. A Cherokee is just not likely to do any serious damage to a building, much less one built to the standards of a nuclear (or *any*) power plant. Visit one sometime, and imagine yourself in the cockpit trying to do some damage. To present such as scenario as a plausible threat to our safety is one version of terrorist activity, as far as I'm concerned. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: N.A.S.A. Astronauts "Autographed" 8x10 Photos | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | December 14th 04 04:37 PM |
Black is black ! | Dummy | Owning | 0 | September 1st 04 05:19 PM |
Black is black | Dummy | General Aviation | 0 | September 1st 04 05:19 PM |
FS: N.A.S.A. Astronauts "Autographed" 8x10 Photos | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 5th 04 05:44 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |