![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Enefesdi Varspooli Bhootpalamdi wrote: you, sir, are an idiot, in addition to a troll. Yep, that could be. and a quite unattractive troll at that. No, actually I'm pretty good looking. the AIM states that you call every position in the pattern, be it in crosswind, downwind, base or final. the aim is advisory, you say, and not regulatory! oh ho, but explain that to an NTSB judge when you've knocked another plane out of the sky and ended several people's lives prematurely because you thought the advisory information was unnecessary, and didn't contribute enough to safety to justify lifting your green, sausagelike finger and depressing the extremely life limited PTT switch, energizing the grossly inefficient, hence gasoline wasting radio, which jeopardizes the lives of thousands of birds in your vicinity simply through its frankensteinesque, extravagant use of radiant energy. Now, that's funny. in fact, you probably have to start your APU just to transmit. Hmmmmm...APU. Might have to get one of those. in all seriousness, i certainly hope you don't come into contact with student pilots or pilots that are still malleable in their attention to detail or attitude towards doing every last useful thing to further safety of flight for everyone; not just themselves. As a matter of fact I do, as a rep of the FAA no less. Every pilot meeting we have with the college I speak of I reccomend that they talk less and look more, just from a personal preference standpoint. you need only consider the situation where instrument traffic gets a late handoff to an uncontrolled CTAF, And then what good is the 48 radio calls you just made if there's no one there? and someone not making any calls going onto base or final, and you have yourselves an error chain fit for a midair. Are you looking outside? Ever? when both planes are low, slow, and focused on the runway. need me to draw a picture? Sounds like about all you would understand. note: read the AIM on proper radio speaking technique, not just when to speak. you'll probably cut down your transmission lengths by half. Have you ever read this newsgroup? Ever? AND ANOTHER THING. stop asking for any traffic in the area to please advise when you change to CTAF; Oh I see now, you think I drive a jet. change 10nm out, that way you can listen for anyone in the pattern making PROPER calls on EVERY leg. Radio calls are not necessary, on any leg. of course, if there was only one person in the pattern there, and they were making one call on every downwind, and doing full-stop taxibacks, you probably want to listen up 20nm up if you're not flying a piper cub. I fly a 182. At 10 miles out one call every midfield downwind would allow me to hear 3 or 4 calls. That's plenty enough for me. How about you? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-14 Ejector Seat fatality circa 1987 | rottenberg | Naval Aviation | 1 | November 16th 04 01:36 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Homebuilt down Friday, one fatality near, Santa Paula, CA | R. Hubbell | Home Built | 2 | November 9th 03 03:08 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Quickie fatality | Sam Hoskins | Home Built | 3 | July 25th 03 05:55 AM |