![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
I thought this was a joke when I first read this, from the AOPA win a twin 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	sweepstakes official rules: "...In compliance with Canadian law, if winner is a Canadian resident, he or she must first correctly answer a mathematical skill-testing question before the prize will be awarded. If the potential winner is unable to correctly answer the question, AOPA will select an alternate winner." Can anyone shed some light as to the purpose of this Canadian law? Is this to keep mathematically-challenged people from owning aircraft?  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM | 
| AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 07:12 PM | 
| AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 09:26 PM | 
| AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 09:26 PM | 
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |