![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
You replied that your son doesn't watch that crap. But somehow he saw the breast in question. Which means he must have been watching that crap. Yeah, I didn't think you got it the first and second time. I ain't explaining it again, Pete. You'll just have to skip that question on the test. the exposed breast was that least of the entire "attack" you've perceived. If the exposed breast was an attack, then the entire halftime show is an all-out war. By golly, I think you might just be getting the point! I sure hope that it is the beginning of a war. You may not give a damn about the kind of lessons being taught to your kid but I damn sure do. Note the use of the future perfect tense, to indicate a hypothetical situation postulated by the following clause beginning with "if". You are claiming kids will always react in this way, regardless of upbringing, while my comment was respect to how they would behave given a different upbringing. shwew Damn! I read that twice and it still went right over my close-minded little head, Pete! Do you write for the FAA on the side? And yet, you left it on, and allowed the children to remain in the room and watch. But you don't get indignant until the breast comes out? Absurd. Naw, I'd call it normal. I'm fairly slow to anger and quick with retribution. By the time Justin violently ripped Janet's clothes off, it was too late. In any case, I'm not talking about how you all reacted to this isolated incident. You aren't? Okay, no fair. You can't switch gears without telling me. Hate it when that happens. If your morality and virtue changed when you had a child, then YOU are the exception. Hmm. You have a point. My point, however, was that before I had a kid, the spectacle of Janet being forcefully declothed on stage would have been laughed at, applauded and even celebrated or simply dismissed ("It's just a nip, man!) - much as you are doing now. Having a kid changed (focused?) that view along with many others. Something you obviously wouldn't understand. Well, that explains a lot. Your belief that children simply inherently act one way or the other, for example, and that how they are raised cannot affect that. What?? Where the hell did that come from! You've lost it, buddy. So how would you have felt if ol' Justin and Janet stripped naked and "went at it" in front of your kid right there on television, Pete? Just curious. Aren't you listening? We don't watch that crap. I see. Avoidance, eh? That's a handy tool in the pattern. Makes you a coward in a debate, though. Answer the question. -- Jim Fisher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oshkosh RAH RAP Frequencies (Final ... sort of) | Jim Weir | Home Built | 4 | July 22nd 04 03:38 PM |
A D Day Reflection Revisited | Dudley Henriques | Naval Aviation | 2 | June 5th 04 05:01 AM |
A D Day Reflection Revisited | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 1 | June 4th 04 12:38 AM |
Concorde Revisited | sandpebble | General Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 05:10 PM |