![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ArtP wrote:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:21:54 GMT, "Dude" wrote: Cirrus has done well, and much of it is due to the passion of the founders. I may be mistaken, but I believe that the investors are likewise passionate. They are not presently trading the stock on an exchange, are they? If not, then the company is still reasonably closely held. Cirrus has done well by taking risks with the customers. The basic design is great but the devil is in the details. They lack good detail design, testing, and quality control. While the COPA web site indicates the quality control is improving, the early users are swinging in the breeze with high maintenance and planes that lost 50% of their value in 2 years. My club has a few dreamers that keep suggesting we should look into getting some Cirruses (our current high-end planes are Mooneys). I sure hope our board doesn't fall for that mistake. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
Cessna profits plunge......OT (or is it?) | C J Campbell | Owning | 28 | February 4th 04 06:13 PM |
Cessna profits plunge......OT (or is it?) | C J Campbell | Piloting | 9 | February 2nd 04 07:06 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Piloting | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |