![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news ![]() "Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... As I commented, I don't see specific phrase in the AIM for the controller to use for clearing an aircraft into the Class C after being told to stand clear - and it might be a good idea... Specific phrases for controller usage are found in FAA Order 7110.65, but there is no phrase like "cancel your last instruction and now comply with this instruction", nor should there be. Previous instructions are simply overridden by subsequent instructions. For example, an aircraft may have been instructed to "fly heading 360", and a bit later is instructed to "turn right heading 020". The 360 heading isn't cancelled prior to the issuance of the 020 heading, the 360 heading is simply overridden by the 020 heading. So, on the first call the pilot was told, "Aircraft calling remain clear of Charlie?, or "November 1234 remain clear of Class Charlie.", or words to that effect... Fine, we all agree he is to remain clear... Now the controller calls a bit later and says something to the effect, "November 1234, radar contact 8 miles east of xyz, altimeter 30 point 00", or some variation and shuts up - because he has established radio contact which is 'the clearance to enter'... Wrong. Radio contact was established when the controller said, "November 1234 remain clear of Class Charlie." So, I asked both, wouldn't you tell the pilot that he is now 'cleared to enter the C', to avoid confusion.. They both replied that there is no confusion... The clearance to enter a Class C airspace is establishing radio contact using the tail number exactly as spelled out in the AIM.. Yes, if nothing else is said that is correct. But in this case the aircraft was instructed to remain clear of Class C airspace and that instruction remains in effect until some instruction is issued that permits entry. Steven, just as you said that the previous instructions would not be explicitly cancelled, so too is the "remain clear." Using the tail number - especially with the phrase "radar contact" - definitely makes it for me. I would enter the Class C. I would expect the following phrases to keep me clear of the Class C - 1) "aircraft calling NE of class C, where did you say you wanted to go?" or 2) Cessna 1234, continue to remain clear of the class C airspace. What are your intentions?" I would find this one confusing "Cessna 1234, where did you say you wanted to go?" It uses the tail number which is enough but indicates that the controller is still trying to figure out what to do with me. I would question whether that establishes radio contact to enter the Class C. The point should be that this isn't a game to try to fool the controller into saying something that unknowingly grants permission. When in doubt, double check. ------------------------------- Travis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |