![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... Steven, just as you said that the previous instructions would not be explicitly cancelled, so too is the "remain clear." Using the tail number - especially with the phrase "radar contact" - definitely makes it for me. I would enter the Class C. Then you would be operating an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised and thus be in violation of FAR 91.123(b). An instruction to "remain clear" is implicitly overridden by an instruction that requires or permits entry of the Class C airspace. "Fly heading 110, vector for traffic" would do it, so would "proceed on course" or "enter a right base for runway 32", but "radar contact" would not. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |