![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George
The rear engine on a 337/0-2 sucks air at high velocity over the center section of the wing giving bird more lift which of course you can use any way you want. Big John `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````````````````````` On Wed, 5 May 2004 12:33:42 -0400, "George A. Graham" wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2004, alexy wrote: (Paul Lee) wrote: I think a good way to settle this is to put a model tractor body in a wind tunel and then reverse the same thing and test it as a pusher. Anybody's got a spare wind tunel and lots of time? Or, if one is looking to "prove" the opposite result, put a model pusher body in a wind tunnel and then reverse the same thing and test it as a tractor! g -- Actually, this question has been answered. The Cessna SkyMaster has both a pusher and a tractor engine. The single engine climb rate and speed are both higher for the rear engine alone, than for the front engine alone. The pusher wins! George Graham RX-7 Powered Graham-EZ, N4449E Homepage http://bfn.org/~ca266 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
A Source for Aluminum | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | October 11th 03 01:38 AM |