![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh Gerald, you are confusing common sense and common knowledge with an
American court room... For GPS to be introduced into a capital case there either has to be a precedent ruling at the appellant level on it's admissibility (I am unaware of any such ruling), or experts have to be called to testify so that the judge can rule on admissibility in this case... This for your and my protections, not just this Scott guy... Unfortunately, this is a big game of 'gotcha' where each side tries to trip the other up, not on the basis of scientific fact, but on the basis of, 'you forgot to say mother may I'... Scott's Lawyers have a good bet going, for excluding the gps/lo-jacker readouts... Look at the courts recent revisiting of finger prints because a sharp defense lawyer realized there never was an appellant level ruling made on the science, in spite of a hundred years of acceptance by the courts... Look at the humbling of the FBI forensic lab, whose preeminent expert proved to be a liar and a charlatan... OTOH, jurists insistence of ruling on the basis of rulings made a hundred years ago, in totally different areas of science long since disproved, as the basis for their current rulings, forms a vast LaBrea tar pit for pilots accused by an FAA inspector, and is directly why the FAA/DOT can rule against a pilot and then appeal to themselves if confronted... This ruling made long ago about the courts deferring to the FAA (CAA in those days), and long before numerous more recent rulings limiting the power of the government to avoid judicial revue, continues to allow federal judges to turn a blind eye to the FAA/DOT's daily violations the constitutional rights of pilots... And now Secy Ridge continues the 'family tradition', of raping any innocent who blunders into a TFR..... Anyway, back to Scott - guilty or not? I suspect that 99% say guilty... But 99% thought Rep. Condit was guilty in the Chandra Levy case during the early going, yet the place and manner of the finding of her corpse now makes his guilt unlikely... And how many convicted rapists are now being found innocent by DNA typing... denny "Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message ink.net... I never read anything about this Scott Petersen murder trial before. I saw a headline about a "GPS." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | Chris | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | December 19th 04 09:40 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ unakm | Aardvark J. Bandersnatch, MP | General Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 11:37 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec | OtisWinslow | Owning | 9 | November 12th 04 06:34 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf | Keith Willshaw | Naval Aviation | 4 | November 11th 04 01:51 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |