![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy!
In article k.net, Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... To enter class C airspace, the FARs say that you have to establish two-way radio communication. Yes, but the FARs also say that except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised. Class C airspace is an area in which air traffic control is exercised, so a pilot that has established two-way radio communications and been instructed to remain clear of Class C airspace must remain outside until further advised. How do you infer that from the plain text of the FARs (especially considering the guidance the AIM offers)? FAR 91.130 - Operations in Class C airspace. (c) Communications. Each person operating an aircraft in Class C airspace must meet the following two-way radio communications requirements: (1) Arrival or through flight. Each person must establish two-way radio communications with the ATC facility (including foreign ATC in the case of foreign airspace designated in the United States) providing air traffic services prior to entering that airspace and thereafter maintain those communications while within that airspace. I also note that it never speaks of "clearance", but "ATC authorization". Unless a two-way radio communication with the ATC facility includes an explicit "remain clear", that communication authorizes entry into the Class C airspace. Do you have an authoritative statement that shows otherwise? Or are you just waving your hands furiously? [snip] From the FARs, the AIM , and my experiences, the acknowledgement of a particular plane by ATC establishes two-way radio communication and is sufficient for the plane to enter the class C - even after the issuance of a "remain clear." The FARs and AIM indicate just the opposite, and you don't have any experience to the contrary, you just misinterpreted the situation. Pray tell which FARs you are reading that say what you seem to think they say? [snip] There is no language in the FARs or AIM that clearly supports either of our opinions. The FARs and AIM support what I've been saying and indicate that you're wrong. The only thing the 91.130 is at all vague about (and it may well be defined elsewhere -- I didn't look) is what consitutes "establishes two-way radio communication". There is no text that says anything about what must happen after a "remain clear" has been issued for class C. What text says what must happen after any ATC instruction is issued? There is no such thing as an instruction to permit entry into class C. Why? Because all ATC instructions are listed in the AIM and there is no such instruction mentioned? No. FARs 91.130 make no reference to a specific instruction (such as a clearance). It merely requires the establishment of two-way radio communication. See my excerpt above. The FARs say that two-way radio communication is sufficient. The AIM says that two-way radio communication is sufficient. Where does it say otherwise? In FAR 91.123 Compliance with ATC clearances and instructions. b) Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised. By the way, you're contradicting yourself. Earlier you wrote; "I agree that ATC can establish communication but instruct the pilot to remain clear." Now you're saying that ATC cannot instruct an aircraft that has established radio communications to remain outside Class C airspace. No, he's not. If a communication includes "remain clear", then you don't enter. If it doesn't include that magic phrase, you are permitted to enter the airspace. Period. Stop. End of story. [snip] If the controller didn't intend for the pilot to remain clear he wouldn't have told him "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". Why would the controller need to repeat that instruction? Because failure to repeat the instruction would create the condition permitting entry into the airspace. [snip remainder of "I know you are but what am I" mindless repetition of unsupportable position by Steve] yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix Bowie, MD, USA | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff | http://www.radix.net/~herveus/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |