![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Houghton" wrote in message ... How do you infer that from the plain text of the FARs (especially considering the guidance the AIM offers)? FAR 91.130 - Operations in Class C airspace. (c) Communications. Each person operating an aircraft in Class C airspace must meet the following two-way radio communications requirements: (1) Arrival or through flight. Each person must establish two-way radio communications with the ATC facility (including foreign ATC in the case of foreign airspace designated in the United States) providing air traffic services prior to entering that airspace and thereafter maintain those communications while within that airspace. Here's the plain text of an applicable FAR, what do you infer from it? FAR 91.123 Compliance with ATC clearances and instructions. (b) Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised. I also note that it never speaks of "clearance", but "ATC authorization". Correct. Unless a two-way radio communication with the ATC facility includes an explicit "remain clear", that communication authorizes entry into the Class C airspace. Also correct, if you had read the thread from the beginning you'd know there was an explicit "remain clear" in this case. Do you have an authoritative statement that shows otherwise? Or are you just waving your hands furiously? I have provided applicable documentation. Pray tell which FARs you are reading that say what you seem to think they say? FAR 91.123 Compliance with ATC clearances and instructions. (b) Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised. The only thing the 91.130 is at all vague about (and it may well be defined elsewhere -- I didn't look) is what consitutes "establishes two-way radio communication". If the FAR isn't clear enough, the AIM certainly is. No. FARs 91.130 make no reference to a specific instruction (such as a clearance). It merely requires the establishment of two-way radio communication. See my excerpt above. Are you saying that ATC cannot instruct an aircraft to remain outside of Class C airspace? No, he's not. If a communication includes "remain clear", then you don't enter. If it doesn't include that magic phrase, you are permitted to enter the airspace. Period. Stop. End of story. In this case the communication did include "remain clear". Because failure to repeat the instruction would create the condition permitting entry into the airspace. Are you saying ATC instructions are valid only until the next communications exchange? What do you base that on? [snip remainder of "I know you are but what am I" mindless repetition of unsupportable position by Steve] If you had read the entire thread you'd have seen I did provide supporting documentation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |