![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy!
In article et, Steven P. McNicoll wrote: "Michael Houghton" wrote in message ... Take a good look in the mirror, Steve. For what? You cleverly omitted the context for that remark. You said: Actually, the issue is cut and dried. From the direction this thread's taken it's clear that some pilots have a poor understanding of regulations and procedures with regard to Class C airspace. Since you didn't get it the first time, let me be blunt: I place you at the head of the class you describe -- pilots with a poor understanding of FAR 91.130. I'm not a pilot. I'm a pilot wannabe without the time or spare money to do anything about it. I can read the FARs, apparently better than you. You're absolutely right. The pilot in the original message had satisfied the conditions required for entry into Class C airspace. No violation of ATC instruction occurred. The pilot in the original message was issued the instruction "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace" by ATC. After departure he proceeded to enter Class C airspace. Please explain how the pilot did not violate that instruction and FAR 91.123(b). As I've said a number of times, FAR 91.130.c.1 authorizes entry upon the establishment of two-way radio communication. In the case at hand, the pilot did not enter Class C airspace until he had received communication from ATC that included his tail number and that did NOT include an instruction to "remain clear". Thus 91.130.c.1 was satisfied, and 91.123(b) was not violated. yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix Bowie, MD, USA | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff | http://www.radix.net/~herveus/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |