![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Houghton" wrote in message ... You cleverly omitted the context for that remark. You said: Actually, the issue is cut and dried. From the direction this thread's taken it's clear that some pilots have a poor understanding of regulations and procedures with regard to Class C airspace. Since you didn't get it the first time, let me be blunt: There is nothing about this issue I don't get. I place you at the head of the class you describe -- pilots with a poor understanding of FAR 91.130. I'm not a pilot. I'm a pilot wannabe without the time or spare money to do anything about it. Oh? What part of FAR 91.130 do you think I don't understand? So not only are you not able to provide any documentation supporting your position, you don't even have any experience with Class C airspace. I, on the other hand, am not only a pilot that bases his aircraft near Class C airspace, I'm a controller that's worked Class C airspace since the day it was established in the US. So which of us do you think might be in a bit better position with regard to knowledge of Class C airspace? If you ever hope to learn anything towards becoming a pilot you'll have to change your attitude. I can read the FARs, apparently better than you. Well, you may read them, but you sure don't understand them. As I've said a number of times, FAR 91.130.c.1 authorizes entry upon the establishment of two-way radio communication. In the case at hand, the pilot did not enter Class C airspace until he had received communication from ATC that included his tail number and that did NOT include an instruction to "remain clear". Thus 91.130.c.1 was satisfied, and 91.123(b) was not violated. Yeah, you keep saying that, and every time you say it it's just as wrong as the first time you said it. Communications are established just once per flight, with the first communications exchange, and the instruction to remain clear is not cancelled by subsequent unrelated communications. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |