A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

commercial privileges



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old February 25th 04, 12:08 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...
Why don't you call the local FSDO and ask them? There seems to be a lot

of
variation between them so you want to know what the one for your area
thinks.


That's a good idea. But I'd have to get a written opinion if I want to rely
on it. It's frustrating to have a system where each FSDO makes up its own
unpublished rules because the published ones don't make sense.

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:_WQ_b.399631$na.765403@attbi_s04...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message

news:yjK_b.113497$jk2.502928@attbi_s53...
"Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message
...
This gets hashed over about every six months...
Basically, a commercial ticket gives you the right to fly for pay,

P
E
R I
O
D...
It does not give you the right to hold out as an air taxi service

by
providing aircraft...

Even in the case of specified part-119 exceptions, such as aerial
photography and local sightseeing?


No, you're fine if you are just doing local sightseeing. AOPA is
working to ensure this doesn't change. Make sure your insurance is ok
for sightseeing and your class 2 medical is good to go. Its common for
flight schools to sell photography flights.


Sure, but flight schools are licensed operators; I'm not. So there

seems
to
be disagreement here as to whether a non-operator commercial pilot can

do
this. And the relevant FARs appear to be gibberish, so I'm still

uncertain
as to what the answer is in practice.

For instance, according to FAR 1.1, to be considered a "commercial
operator", you have to be engaged in "air commerce". But according to

1.1,
to be considered "air commerce", your activity has to be interstate,
international, on Federal airways, or involving mail delivery.

Otherwise,
no "air commerce", hence no "commercial operator". But part 119 only
applies to "commercial operators" as defined in 1.1. And parts 121 and

135
only apply to those to whom part 119 applies--except for local

sightseeing
flights, which part 135 addresses even when part 119 doesn't apply. So

as
long as you stay in one state, avoid Federal airways, don't deliver

mail,
and don't do local sightseeing flights (but long-range sightseeing is

ok!),
nothing in 119, 121, or 135 is applicable. That can't be what the FAA
meant, but it's what they've written.

--Gary






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial polar routes? General Aviation 6 January 28th 05 08:03 PM
Best Option for Private Pilot to Multi Commercial Instrument Ratings Hudson Valley Amusement Instrument Flight Rules 34 December 17th 04 09:25 PM
The Doctor Says: Flying and Homebuilding Are Privileges, NOT Rights jls Home Built 3 August 23rd 04 04:49 AM
Commercial dual crosscountry definition David Brooks Piloting 20 February 6th 04 06:23 PM
good and cheap commercial flying school hananc Piloting 1 October 23rd 03 04:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.