![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et... Why don't you call the local FSDO and ask them? There seems to be a lot of variation between them so you want to know what the one for your area thinks. That's a good idea. But I'd have to get a written opinion if I want to rely on it. It's frustrating to have a system where each FSDO makes up its own unpublished rules because the published ones don't make sense. --Gary "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:_WQ_b.399631$na.765403@attbi_s04... "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message om... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:yjK_b.113497$jk2.502928@attbi_s53... "Dennis O'Connor" wrote in message ... This gets hashed over about every six months... Basically, a commercial ticket gives you the right to fly for pay, P E R I O D... It does not give you the right to hold out as an air taxi service by providing aircraft... Even in the case of specified part-119 exceptions, such as aerial photography and local sightseeing? No, you're fine if you are just doing local sightseeing. AOPA is working to ensure this doesn't change. Make sure your insurance is ok for sightseeing and your class 2 medical is good to go. Its common for flight schools to sell photography flights. Sure, but flight schools are licensed operators; I'm not. So there seems to be disagreement here as to whether a non-operator commercial pilot can do this. And the relevant FARs appear to be gibberish, so I'm still uncertain as to what the answer is in practice. For instance, according to FAR 1.1, to be considered a "commercial operator", you have to be engaged in "air commerce". But according to 1.1, to be considered "air commerce", your activity has to be interstate, international, on Federal airways, or involving mail delivery. Otherwise, no "air commerce", hence no "commercial operator". But part 119 only applies to "commercial operators" as defined in 1.1. And parts 121 and 135 only apply to those to whom part 119 applies--except for local sightseeing flights, which part 135 addresses even when part 119 doesn't apply. So as long as you stay in one state, avoid Federal airways, don't deliver mail, and don't do local sightseeing flights (but long-range sightseeing is ok!), nothing in 119, 121, or 135 is applicable. That can't be what the FAA meant, but it's what they've written. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial polar routes? | General Aviation | 6 | January 28th 05 08:03 PM | |
Best Option for Private Pilot to Multi Commercial Instrument Ratings | Hudson Valley Amusement | Instrument Flight Rules | 34 | December 17th 04 09:25 PM |
The Doctor Says: Flying and Homebuilding Are Privileges, NOT Rights | jls | Home Built | 3 | August 23rd 04 04:49 AM |
Commercial dual crosscountry definition | David Brooks | Piloting | 20 | February 6th 04 06:23 PM |
good and cheap commercial flying school | hananc | Piloting | 1 | October 23rd 03 04:13 PM |