![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Robinson wrote in message ...
Dean Wilkinson wrote: The controller in this case clearly screwed up since he instructed the Russian jet to descend when the Russian crew told him they had an RA instructing them to climb. You might like to wait for the accident report, since that isn't what the initial review of the CVR and FDR indicated. Really? I read the initial review, and the CVR transcripts. It appeared to me that the contoller gave bad advice, and Russian captain made the mistake of heeding it. The TCAS system had warned the Russian crew to climb, but just as they started to comply, the controller instructed the aircraft to descend. The Russian crew did not first tell the controller that they had an RA instructing them to climb, so the controller did not override that alert. The DHL crew got an instruction to descend from their TCAS, and announced that they were doing so. So, given that the DHL crew told the controller that they were responding to a TCAS RA, the controller KNEW he had an RA on his hands and that it applied to BOTH aircraft. Remember, the TCAS systems on both planes communicate with each other over the transponder frequency, if one had an RA, both had an RA. The Russians don't appear to have given proper training to their crews regarding the TCAS system because the crew didn't ignore the controller like they should have and followed the RA. Again, you don't know what their training is. The pilot didn't follow the instructions, but he might have done that on his own, contrary to his training. There has also been some argument that the controller's instructions should have priority over those of the on-board system. Actually, when I worked for Boeing it was pretty clear that the Russians were installing TCAS to comply with the rules for flying in European airspace, but that they weren't necessarily adopting the TCAS philosophy... Why not wait for the accident report instead of making rash, misinformed accusations? It is pretty rash of you to assume that I am misinformed... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Why the Royal Australian Air Force went for Israeli Python-4 AAM's over US AIM-9L's | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 79 | July 19th 03 03:33 AM |