A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Could something like this actually work?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old March 1st 04, 02:40 PM
Marc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Louis L. Perley III" wrote in message
...
Saw an article today about an aircraft that would change it's buoyancy, so
it would float up like a balloon and then change buoyancy and glide down.
Interesting stuff, although I doubt we'll see it anytime soon. Is

something
like this even practical? The article says they take the aircraft up 10
miles to get 400 miles range, I would think ATC wouldn't like the idea of

a
free balloon (which is what it would be at that point) up in the flight
levels.


http://www.machinedesign.com/ASP/vie...PACE&catId=379



1) I wonder why a typical blimp has to use such a large volume (the ballon)
to provide the lift and a relatively tiny cabin attached underneath, whereas
this craft seems to use a much smaller volume (the wings). Has the inventor
calculated this correctly?

2) Where is the power source? Conservation of energy says that the plane
could not continue to ascend and descend without some input of energy. The
initial ascent would be powered by the energy required to separate helium
from the atmosphere, which is accomplished on the ground, but it should not
be true that the plane would "always land with its tanks fully pressurized",
since theoretically the amount of energy generated by the turbines during
the descent could not be enough to compress the gas used for the ascent.
Esecially if the efficiency of the turbines is 20%.

On the other hand I still think that Boeing 747s get off the ground by some
sort of magic. There is no way such a huge vehicle could be lifted by thin
air.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
Best Home Base Work Reynard Owning 0 November 9th 04 04:37 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 2nd 04 07:17 AM
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 10th 04 11:06 PM
Ford V-6 engine work Corky Scott Home Built 19 August 21st 03 12:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.