![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This is addressed in the Wall Street Journal today. The writer points to Poland as the next probable target, since it too has troops in Iraq, and is more vulnerable than either the U.S. or Britain (and perhaps more susceptible to blackmail). On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:44:17 GMT, "Tony Cox" wrote: "Cub Driver" wrote in message .. . That was my reaction also. I don't know if it makes random attacks on Spanish targets more likely, but it certainly makes attacks on BRITISH targets more likely. Probably Polish targets as well. I disagree. Britain has always been a target. An attack would not change government policy (even if Labour were kicked out, the Conservatives are even more bullish). And the UK have a clearer sense of their global responsibilities than Spain. Of course, this doesn't preclude an attack out of spite, but that is as likely now as it was before the weekend. The most likely enhanced targets are France and Germany (over the hajib issue), and in fact these two have today called for an EU-wide emergency security conference. The big loser in this is not the coalition forces in Iraq; rather it is the institutions of the EU. The idea of a common defense force is exposed as a farce (with Spain turning tail after just one bloody nose), and continent-wide unity dealt a further blow (as the Spanish political establishment is clearly not in the least concerned that their actions have made life more dangerous and difficult for the rest of the people of the EU). all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|