![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tom,
As much as I question the value of the military action in Iraq in terms of the war on terror, And an effective alternative is...what? better intelligence work could have prevented 9/11 for a start. Or choosing our friends more wisely would be a good idea. E.g. not supplying terrorists like OBL with weapons just because at the moment they are shooting them at people we don't like. Please note that I'm not ruling out military action as an option, if there is reason to believe that possible future terrorist acts can be prevented. Afghanistan was justified in my view, given that the taliban openly supported OBL, only the job was not finished (yet again!). Iraq was never really about terrorism, was it? Maybe the bush administration was really that much mistaken about Iraqs capabilities to build WMDs, i can't judge that. But Saddam was never harbouring terrorists, because he hated islamic fundamentalists and they hated him. They both hated the US, but for completely different reasons. regards, Friedrich -- for personal email please remove "entfernen." from my adress |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|