![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The browser identity string is settable on Linux browsers and many are set
to show themselves as being Windows machines running IE. This is because there are a lot of sites that block entry unless IE on MS. Nevertheless, Windows is still the predominant platform for desktops. But don't count on that forever - corporate America is poised to make the jump, led by IBM and others, to Linux. Good or bad, that is happening now. Personally, I am for the freedom to use whatever platform you want (right now most of my stuff is Windows), and not support a private standard such as MS. "Gig Giacona" wrote in message ... I was a Mac user back at version something. About 5 years ago I gave up. Yes they have a great operating system but Apple has done everything possible to screw up the adoption of it by the general public. According to Google Zeitgeist the operating systems used to access Google during February 2004 by percentage were Windows 98 23% Windows XP 46% Windows 2000 18% Windows NT 3% Windows 95 1 % Mac 4% Linux 1% Other 1% That's 91% for Windows. There just isn't the base out there for every body to port every thing to non-Windows OS. Hell, the virus writers don't even port their stuff to Mac. "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... Morgans wrote: Who cares? You are a very small minority. (only half a grin, here) The question is: Does AOPA care (about the minority that doesn't spew viruses at everyone {8^) ? I am, after all, an AOPA member. Seriously: I spend a nontrivial amount of effort selling people on non-viral-farm solutions. Thanks to Apple's OSX, this is actually quite feasible for the nontechnical today. So what is AOPA saying about safe computing (and never mind monocultures) if they ignore us? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
x-43 Flight | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 12:42 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004 | Steve House | Piloting | 15 | July 31st 03 06:30 PM |