![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A typical power chart for a constant speed prop will limit the RPM to
2400 at all altitudes and power settings. The 75% power table will just end when it is no longer possible to make enough manifold pressure to get 75% HP out of the engine at 2400 RPM. In contrast, a fixed pitch prop will turn faster and faster to make 75% at high altitudes. I think some Cherokees call for up to 2650 RPM cruise settings. Another way to look at it is that a plane with a constant speed prop may take off with full throttle and full RPM, reach a cruising altitude of 8000' and then pull back to 2400 RPM (leaving the throttle full forward) while a fixed pitch prop plane would just accept a few hundred RPM rise at full throttle and 8000'. Is the answer that the constant speed prop is slowed down because we *can* and the fixed pitch prop is just suffering all the ill effects you'd expect, like higher wear, more noise and frictional losses? -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 05:41 AM |
| more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 05:22 AM |
| Piper Pathfinder Article | john smith | Piloting | 24 | March 14th 04 02:04 AM |
| Jet fighter top speed at military power | David L. Pulver | Military Aviation | 18 | December 1st 03 08:13 PM |
| Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 04:29 PM |