![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 18:17:24 -0700, Jim Weir wrote:
snipped for length, not for content. On the other hand, they have to pull it apart anyway, so why not just do the overhaul for the price of a couple of hours of labor and some dollar parts? Was lucky to have a prop shop next door for a few years, will only add a few thoughts. On the older McCauley's, at overhaul, the blades have to be unscrewed from the ferrules (sp?) and inspected. The longer it has been since this has been done, the more difficult it is, and the more likely you are to find problems. The newer McCauley hub designs are stone-simple and relatively easy to o-haul. The only real down side would be blade rework/inspection (material removed working toward min specs). I would agree that on a McCauley in most cases overhaul would be the way to go. If you've got a common compact hub Hartzell (not applicable in this particular case), "overhaul" means they have to roll the blade shanks near the butt and then polish to remove the roll "marks". There is also a min. diameter for the blade shanks. As above, there are also requirements for blade rework (accompanied by another set of min specs). For 91 operators, I've always recommended a 5 year (max) tear-down, hub corrosion inspection, and re-seal. FWIW, there were always a lot fewer scrapped parts coming out of the McCauley end of the shop than the Hartzell end. Corrosion from infrequent inspection/improper lubrication being the primary issue. Never saw a corrosion problem inside the Hartzell props on "working" airplanes (greased every 100 hrs/2-3 months, o-hauled every 3-4 years). Always thought that a grease job every 100 hrs/6 months (regardless of hours in the air) would be a good idea for relatively in-frequent flyers. TC snip |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 04:41 AM |
Is there a minimum prop speed? | Jim Carter | Owning | 2 | June 29th 04 01:49 AM |
Why do constant speed power setting charts limit RPM? | Ben Jackson | Piloting | 6 | April 16th 04 03:41 AM |
Practicing SFLs with a constant speed prop - how? | Ed | Piloting | 22 | April 16th 04 02:42 AM |
Constant Speed Prop vs Variable Engine Timing | Jay | Home Built | 44 | March 3rd 04 10:08 PM |